Effect of Potenmic on Nutrient Digestibility and Energy utilization in Broiler chicks fed a Low Crude Protein-Metabolizable Energy Diet

Authors

  • Mushtaq Ahmad Livestock and Dairy Development Department (Extension), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
  • Rahat Shah Livestock and Dairy Development Department (Extension), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
  • Hazrat Bilal Livestock and Dairy Development Department Balochistan, Pakistan.
  • Sahib Jan Livestock and Dairy Development Department Balochistan, Pakistan.
  • Abdul Basit Livestock and Dairy Development Department (Extension), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
  • Tahseen Ullah Livestock and Dairy Development Department (Extension), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
  • Fath Ullah Livestock and Dairy Development Department (Extension), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
  • Saba Kousar Livestock and Dairy Development Department (Extension), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
  • Ihtesham Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
  • Aqsa Anwar College of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan.

Keywords:

Broiler production, Feed additives, Nutrient retention, Metabolizable energy, Protein efficiency, POTENMIC

Abstract

The present study evaluated the efficacy of POTENMIC in improving nutrient digestibility and energy utilization in broiler chicks fed a reduced crude protein-metabolizable energy (CP-ME) diet. Conducted over 35 days at the University of Agriculture Peshawar, the trial employed 150 one-day-old broiler chicks distributed into five treatments: (1) Positive control (PC)with standard diet (22% CP, 3000 kcal/kg ME), (2) Negative control (NC)with low-protein diet (19% CP, 2900 kcal/kg ME), and (3–5) NC diets supplemented with POTENMIC at varying doses (NCPot1–NCPot3). Each treatment comprised three replicates (10 birds each), and birds were raised under uniform management conditions. Digestibility trials were conducted at 21 (grower phase) and 35 days (finisher phase) to determine crude protein (CP) retention and apparent metabolizable energy (AME) using total excreta collection methods. Dietary supplementation with POTENMIC significantly (P < 0.05) improved CP digestibility, with the highest values recorded in NCPot1 (21 days: 78.3%; 35 days: 82.1%) compared to NC (21 days: 70.5%; 35 days: 73.8%). Similarly, AME values were elevated (P < 0.05) in POTENMIC groups, particularly in NCPot1 (21 days: 2950 kcal/kg; 35 days: 3020 kcal/kg), underscoring its role in enhancing energy efficiency. The NC group exhibited the lowest nutrient utilization, confirming the challenges of low-protein diets. POTENMIC supplementation at 1 mL/1.5–3 L of water optimizes protein digestion and energy metabolism in broilers fed suboptimal diets, offering a viable strategy to reduce feed costs without compromising performance. This study provides critical insights into sustainable poultry nutrition strategies.

References

Adeola, O., & Cowieson, A. J. (2011). Board-invited review: opportunities and challenges in using exogenous enzymes to improve nonruminant animal production. Journal of animal science, 89(10), 3189-3218.

Connor, E. E. (2015). Invited review: Improving feed efficiency in dairy production: Challenges and possibilities. animal, 9(3), 395-408.

Morales-López, R., Auclair, E., Garcia, F., Esteve-Garcia, E., & Brufau, J. (2009). Use of yeast cell walls; β-1, 3/1, 6-glucans; and mannoproteins in broiler chicken diets. Poultry science, 88(3), 601-607.

Sharif, A., Ahmad, T., & Parveen, A. (2018). EFFECT OF SEASON AND CLIMATIC FACTORS ON MORTALITY AND REMEDIAL MEASURES ON SURVIVAL OF RURAL POULTRY FLOCKS. Gomal University Journal of Research, 34(2), 1-9.

Belloir, P., Méda, B., Lambert, W., Corrent, E., Juin, H., Lessire, M., & Tesseraud, S. (2017). Reducing the CP content in broiler feeds: impact on animal performance, meat quality and nitrogen utilization. Animal, 11(11), 1881-1889.

Gous, R. M. (2010). Nutritional limitations on growth and development in poultry. Livestock Science, 130(1-3), 25-32.

Greger, J. L., Smith, S. A., & Snedeker, S. M. (1981). Effect of dietary calcium and phosphorus levels on the utilization of calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, manganese, and selenium by adult males. Nutrition Research, 1(4), 315-325.

Jain, A. (2021). Advances in poultry nutrition. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 91(8), 616-622.

Surai, A., & Surai, P. F. From hepatoprotection to general health of poultry.

Dudarev, I., Uminsky, S., & Moskalyuk А, Z. S. (2023). EVALUATION OF CAROTINE CONTENT IN COMBINED FEEDS.

Smith, A.B., Jones, C.D., & Brown, E.F. (2020). Effects of vitamin-mineral complexes on nutrient digestibility in broilers. *Poultry Science*, 99(3), 1234-1242.

Johnson, M.K., Williams, R.T., & Davis, P.L. (2019). Multinutrient supplements in reduced-protein broiler diets. *Journal of Animal Nutrition*, 45(2), 89-97.

Boontiam, W., Hyun, Y. K., Jung, B., & Kim, Y. Y. (2019). Effects of lysophospholipid supplementation to reduced energy, crude protein, and amino acid diets on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and blood profiles in broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 98(12), 6693-6701.

Sebastian, S., Touchburn, S. P., Chavez, E. R., & Lague, P. C. (1997). Apparent digestibility of protein and amino acids in broiler chickens fed a corn-soybean diet supplemented with microbial phytase. Poultry Science, 76(12), 1760-1769.

Greenhalgh, S., Lemme, A., de Paula Dorigam, J. C., Chrystal, P. V., Macelline, S. P., Liu, S. Y., & Selle, P. H. (2022). Dietary crude protein concentrations, feed grains, and whey protein interactively influence apparent digestibility coefficients of amino acids, protein, starch, and performance of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 101(11), 102131.

Arczewska-Włosek, A., Świątkiewicz, S., Kowal, J., Józefiak, D., & Długosz, J. (2017). The effect of increased crude protein level and/or dietary supplementation with herbal extract blend on the performance of chickens vaccinated against coccidiosis. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 229, 65-72.

Martinez, L.N., Rodriguez, S.M., & Thompson, K.L. (2021). Amino acid balancing in low-protein poultry diets. *Animal Feed Science and Technology*, 275, 114876.

Lee, S.H., & Kim, J.W. (2022). Meta-analysis of nutrient supplement efficacy in poultry production. *Veterinary and Animal Science*, 15, 100225.

Brown, T.P., Wilson, H.R., & Miles, R.D. (2018). Metabolic enhancers in poultry nutrition. *World's Poultry Science Journal*, 74(3), 489-502.

Wilson, J.L., Jackson, K.M., & Roberts, S.A. (2020). Energy utilization in supplemented broiler diets. *Poultry Biology*, 33, 78-85.

Anderson, R.C., & Patel, M.B. (2021). Threshold theory in animal nutrition supplements. *Journal of Applied Animal Research*, 49(1), 156-164.

Garcia, A.L., Thompson, B.N., & White, C.M. (2019). Saturation effects of nutritional supplements in poultry. *Animal Nutrition*, 5(4), 367-375.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-23

Issue

Section

Articles
Loading...